the blog posts

budgets are us...

/

There is a relatively new trend in the arena of local governance and it's the concept of participatory budgeting. In this scheme, residents of an area are given a direct role in deciding on the budget spend for their neighbourhood. In other words, the residents decide what is important to them and the local government uses a portion of its budget to accommodate that action, event or structure. The allocation can be up to 20% of the municipality's budget.

To be clear, this is a new trend in the United States not in the rest of the world. Countries such as Brazil have used participatory budgeting since the late 1980s and more than 1200 municipalities in Latin America, Africa, Asia, Canada and Europe use this approach regularly.

Participatory budgeting does not involve a complete handover of the budget process to voters; rather, a portion of the budget, generally for one-off, non-essential projects, is set aside for this process. As outlined on Shareable by Mira Luna in the article Participatory Budgeting: Sharing Power Over Public Resourses, the steps include the following:

  • A government and/or nonprofit develops the 1st year participatory budgeting process.
  • The government approves the amount of the budget to be turned over to the voters.
  • Neighborhood assemblies are organized and meet to determine budget categories (public safety, education, health, environment, sanitation, etc.) and who will be making project proposals to the community, either on a city-wide or district/neighborhood basis.
  • Proposals are developed in collaboration with nonprofits, technical experts and government officials.
  • Proposals are presented, publicized, discussed and voted on by everyone eligible in the community (usually more inclusive criteria for voting than electoral voting).  
  • The process is refined to achieve greater budget inclusion, transparency, diversity, participation, and quality of proposals.

Toronto Community Housing actually gives over its capital budget (some $9 million) to its tenants, who use the participatory budgeting approach for decision-making.

This is an exciting way to promote civic engagement and participation and, of course, true democracy. It would be interesting to see it happen in Bermuda.

litterplugs by cabel

/

"Litterplugs" are trash can alternatives; literally plugging your litter anywhere but on the ground! This funny but true blog post is brought to you by cabel.me via Urban Planning Blog.

Litterplugs

We all know it’s not cool to litter. If our hands are burdened with the weighty responsibility of an unwanted and snot-spent tissue, or an empty aluminum can that once held some Dr. Skipper, or even a gentle gum wrapper, the worst thing — the worst possible thing — would be to throw it on the ground. Click here to continue reading...

image: cabel.me

How often do you utilise an alternative trash can?

black = urban and other stereotypes

/

Over at the blog, The Black Urbanist, Kristen Jeffers called out the media last month for a bit of laziness in perpetuating stereotypes, fusing together development terms and race. As she puts it in her piece, Development Types are not an Euphemism for Race, "Urban development is one thing, but naming something or someone as urban, when they are really just black is a problem." I wondered whether we do the same thing here in Bermuda. As Jeffers notes, does black = urban and white = suburban?

image: the black urbanistLooking at the 2010 Census, the only obvious concentration of population that could be called 'urban' is to be found in Pembroke. There the population is 10,610 people, including the City of Hamilton. The other parishes have a population that ranges from 5,406 (Smith's) to 8,615 (Warwick). Is Pembroke black and, therefore, urban? Is Smith's white and surburban? It's hard to tell because the concentrations of population groups are not distinctive enough, in my opinion. I could be wrong. Read Jeffers article and think about it.